Could there be a single memebr of Biden's administration who wouldn't take the opportunity to sabotage the country? Possibly, but it seems like Trump is distancing himself from the previous administration as precaution and not because of a grudge.
Well after trusting Fauci in 2019, I would assume that Trump would treat everyone from a previous Regime to be hostile until proven otherwise.
and/or elections. She'd sell us out if she had the chance.
I can't think of a single reason why a STATE officer would need that
level of access to NATIONAL security information.
There is some significance to that, indeed, but with his declining mental
condition, I am not so sure it is as significant as we might believe. OTOH, it would not be bad for this administration to at least consult with some members of the previous one.
Could there be a single memebr of Biden's administration who wouldn't take the
opportunity to sabotage the country? Possibly, but it seems like Trump is distancing himself from the previous administration as a precaution and not because of a grudge.
They do that here too, so if Leticia wanted Trump's tax info, she could probably get it from the state's dept of revenue.
I'm more concerned about her
getting her paws on information that pertains to security and/or elections. She'd sell us out if she had the chance.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Maybe if it was a good administration. The current one is shaping up
very nicely. The next president should consider keeping a lot of these people (especially Musk) on speed dial.
Leticia James is the piece of trash who charged then ex-president Trump with fraud, but in related news, I've personally reported people for welfare fraud (because they victimized my disabled loved one) and
Leticia James never did anything about it.
Leticia James is the piece of trash who charged then ex-president Tru with fraud, but in related news, I've personally reported people for welfare fraud (because they victimized my disabled loved one) and Leticia James never did anything about it.
Of course she didn't. That wasn't their plan.
And keeping people dependent on welfare was part of their plan.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
And keeping people dependent on welfare was part of their plan.
There's logic in that, but I don't get why they wouldn't want to stop peasants from taking a piece of their pie.
There's logic in that, but I don't get why they wouldn't want to stop peasants from taking a piece of their pie.
Because it's not their pie. They took their piece out at tax collection time. The payouts happen after that.
The Elitists want a return to feudal times where they are the "lords"
and the rest of us are serfs.
To that end, they want to create a dependent class. People pay in. The Elitists take their cut. Then whatever is left is doled out to the
serfs. But never enough for them to get out of being a serf.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 492955:06:36 |
| Calls: | 392 |
| Files: | 6,767 |
| Messages: | 240,713 |