1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. POLITICS

  • Re: Pardons

    From IB Joe@1:342/202 to Ron L. on Sun Jan 12 09:54:58 2025
    On 11 Jan 2025, Ron L. said the following...

    IHMO: Any gov't agent who blatently violates the Constitution (they all take an oath to uphold it when they are sworn in) should be:
    1. Removed from office.
    2. Tried for treason.
    3. Found guilty and hung from an oak tree in plain view.

    I think many of the Elitists will seek opportunities elsewhere.


    I think it's a great start to look into the constitutionality of these types of pardons. Even if they have to go back and undo Nixon's pardon as unconstitutional.

    If the Democrats learn this is all they have to do they'll do it... P Ditty (Spelling)... Epstein... Whatever and whomever.

    The Supreme court needs to grow a pare...

    IB Joe, Pronouns (FJB/LGB)
    AKA Joe Schweier
    SysOp of 4A 6F 65 73 42 42 53
    -=JoesBBS.com=-

    ... Condense soup, not books!

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/202)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to IB Joe on Sat Jan 11 08:04:58 2025
    IB Joe wrote to Mike Powell <=-

    If Joe's pardon of Hunter sticks, I suspect that the "get out of jail free" type pardons may become more common than we'd all like.

    They should test the constitutionality of these or Democrat presidents will be using these all the time.

    IHMO: Any gov't agent who blatently violates the Constitution (they all take an oath to uphold it when they are sworn in) should be:
    1. Removed from office.
    2. Tried for treason.
    3. Found guilty and hung from an oak tree in plain view.

    I think many of the Elitists will seek opportunities elsewhere.


    ... You look like a million dollars. All in loose change.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to IB Joe on Mon Jan 13 08:02:34 2025
    IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-

    I think it's a great start to look into the constitutionality of these types of pardons. Even if they have to go back and undo Nixon's pardon
    as unconstitutional.

    Yes, that would be a good start. Is Sleepy Joe #1 when it comes to Pardons now?

    The Supreme court needs to grow a pare...

    But the Supreme Court is not there to hear all cases and, sadly, it's their job to say "this isn't a case we hear" and push it back to the level where it should.

    That does allow Activist judges to rule incorrectly, but that's a different problem. I don't know what it takes to get a judge removed.


    ... But honey, I wouldn't be up so late on a faster machine!
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From IB Joe@1:342/202 to Ron L. on Mon Jan 13 08:54:16 2025
    On 13 Jan 2025, Ron L. said the following...

    Yes, that would be a good start. Is Sleepy Joe #1 when it comes to Pardons now?


    I think I heard he's done more than the last 3 combined.


    But the Supreme Court is not there to hear all cases and, sadly, it's their job to say "this isn't a case we hear" and push it back to the
    level where it should.

    That does allow Activist judges to rule incorrectly, but that's a different problem. I don't know what it takes to get a judge removed.


    I was hearing that they didn't want to look at the NY case until there was a decision, now that there is they should be all ears after the appeals court hears it out.

    IB Joe, Pronouns (FJB/LGB)
    AKA Joe Schweier
    SysOp of 4A 6F 65 73 42 42 53
    -=JoesBBS.com=-

    ... As I said before, I never repeat myself

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/202)