Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's being a little too optimistic. He (Adams) claims that they're leaving NYC and going to places like upstate NY and/or back to Texas.
Many of these migrants are coming from countries that don't even have anything worth stealing. But here in the states, this is a thief's
dream come true.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
As long as it speeds up the process. And the government just prints
money anyway, it won't cost us a thing.
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
What about the women affected? Don't they have any say?
I'm saying that if the majority want abortion on demand, they need to
get out and vote for it.
There was just a vote for president, but there was no vote for
abortion. Why should/would there be?
Since the majority of voters are sending conservatives to my state legislation, the lawmakers are supporting defendig the unborn.
Actually, since Donald Trump is saying the states are now voting on it maybe there should be a vote. Was there a vote for it in Tennessee.
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That works until they leave Left-run areas. Rednecks handle thiefs differently.
Most abortions (93%) happened in the first trimester.
Throwing a "60% of late term" number out, making it sound like a big number, is inaccurate. It would come out to 4 out of every 100 total abortions, or 4%. If "late term" is third trimester only, it would come out to 1 out of every 200, or 0.5%.
That's the crux of the matter. All of this talk about 'freedom' is
freedom to murder. SMH
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
As long as it speeds up the process. And the government just prints money anyway, it won't cost us a thing.
But it does cost us plenty.
Printing money = Inflation = Tax on everyone's money, even what we have sitting in retirement funds, savings, etc.
jimmylogan wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
There was just a vote for president, but there was no vote for
abortion. Why should/would there be?
Did you read my comments on representative republic? People vote for
and against issues every time they elect a senetor or representative,
or even a school board member or county commissioner.
Since the majority of voters are sending conservatives to my state legislation, the lawmakers are supporting defendig the unborn.
Actually, since Donald Trump is saying the states are now voting on it maybe there should be a vote. Was there a vote for it in Tennessee.
Not on the ballet this year, becasue - again - the majority are conservative because that is what is being sent to the legislature
each year.
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
It doesn't, but it should matter equally. The unborn hasn't reached
a voting age yet, just like a toddler or teen hasn't. I'm simply expressing my desire that they not be sacrificed.
jimmylogan wrote to Dr. What <=-
This is a good point! Tennessee is a 'gun toting' state. I won't shoot
you in the back for stealing my television, but I will defend myself
and others if you threaten by coming into my house while I am home.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Printing money = Inflation = Tax on everyone's money, even what we have sitting in retirement funds, savings, etc.
Hello @RonL... sarcasm
Hello @RonL... sarcasm
That's why we usually mark is **sarcasm**. Verbal cues don't work well via messages.
If I use your percentage - 60% elective after the first trimester - and the percentage of abortions that are not first trimester - 7% - there
has been no year where that would account for 100,000 babies. It would
be less than 4,000 that are elective after the first trimester.
How many of those thousands of kids can I put you down for adopting?
Since 1990 abortions performed have decreased by ~ 2/3rds... Shocking, to me anyway. Giving expectant mothers the choice and assistance they seem to go with having the baby.
I say give women the support they need and if they choose to have an abortion have it early on...
If you guys on the left keep pushing unfeathered abortion any time... youigh
be sorry someday as someone might push for the rights of the unborn.
I believe no one should kill a viable and healthy unborn baby... Just hoursr
days before it could be born naturally.
There are people waiting to adopt... They'll be sent out to nice homes. Iur
61 tomorrow. My oldest is ~40 and I have a 14 year old in the house... Shes
1 year younger than my youngest granddaughter and I have a pissed off Lesbian Marxist living in the basement... to boot... I'm shocked she hasn't come up from her room claiming she's joined the 4B movement.
I would assume as a Lesbian she already has most, or all, of those 4Bs covered. :D
You actually bring up an interesting point (between this message and the last one). The women I have noticed who seem to want the fewest restrictions put on abortion are usually in groups (older, lesbian) who are not very likely to be getting pregnant.
Maybe I am wrong there but that is my observation.
Mike Powell wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
It doesn't, but it should matter equally. The unborn hasn't reached
a voting age yet, just like a toddler or teen hasn't. I'm simply
expressing my desire that they not be sacrificed.
It should be based on viability age. Living toddlers and teens are viable. Many late-term premature babies are viable without extensive
life support. Most early term premature babies are very much not
viable.
That makes a very logical cut-off point.
They are alive, for the record...
jimmylogan wrote to Dr. What <=-
Remember the man and woman in St. Louis that defended their home with
the THREAT of shooting? And the state attourney, I think it was, wanted
to prosecute them?
It should be based on viability age. Living toddlers and teens are viable. Many late-term premature babies are viable without extensive life support. Most early term premature babies are very much not
viable.
That makes a very logical cut-off point.
Though I disagree that that should be the 'cut-off,' I would GLADLY
go along with that as opposed to abortion on demand - any time, any
reason. At least it's a step in the right direction...
Mike Powell wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
It should be based on viability age. Living toddlers and teens are viable. Many late-term premature babies are viable without extensive life support. Most early term premature babies are very much not viable.
That makes a very logical cut-off point.
Though I disagree that that should be the 'cut-off,' I would GLADLY
go along with that as opposed to abortion on demand - any time, any
reason. At least it's a step in the right direction...
I don't believe that "on demand" is right, either. Over time, I would think that would be both physically and mentally damaging to the
persons who use abortion in that manner. The procedure should be more
of a last resort.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 39:26:03 |
| Calls: | 365 |
| Files: | 6,432 |
| Messages: | 236,168 |