Hello Dan!
27 Sep 25 14:26, Dan Clough wrote to Gerrit Kuehn:
Going purely ad hominem instead of talking about the actual content?
Come on, that's too easy. You can do better than that.
Well, I actually *WAS* commenting on the actual content. The other poster was extolling the opinion of the fake "physicist", and I was discounting his qualifications. Completely referencing the actual content. Pffffffffttttt.
Weill, the minor parts of the content in that case. Anyways, who decides who is a "fake" physicist and who is not?
Regards,
Gerrit
... 10:42PM up 295 days, 4:49, 10 users, load averages: 1.04, 0.84, 0.76
--- msged/fbsd 6.3 2021-12-02
* Origin: America asleep, since Mulberry's too long (2:240/12)