poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

Trump looked like a fool, Kimmel called it out, and his administration
is continuing to push a dangerous narrative that "liberal violence and hate" is the enemy.

Wow. The utter cluelessness of that statement is astounding. Can you even think for yourself, or are you just another bot who gets programmed by his TV every day?

We have piles of video evidence of the Left using inflammatory rhetoric, but we seem to only have evidence of everyone else just saying the truth.

Oh, but that's right. Ignorant like you don't even know the meanings of the labels you want to slap on people to shut them up (which doesn't work anymore, BTW). And you seem to think that telling the truth is "hate speech".

Trump ordered the FCC to intimidate ABC, ABC
probably wanted to get rid of their late night show anyways, and saw a patsy.

I know this will break your precious Narrative, but that didn't happen.

But we all know how you ignorant Leftists like to make stuff up to further your false Narrative.

The facts are:
1. Kimmel broke FCC rules.
2. The ratings for Kimmel's show is tanking and has been for some time now.
3. The LOCAL AFFILIATES dropped Kimmel's show because of what he said.

Disney, who's finances are hurting because of THEIR Wokeness, probably wanted to difuse this mess as quickly as possible.

And they already announced the Kimmel's show is coming back. The most of the local affiliates won't broadcast it. How low can a show's ratings go before the parent company kills it?

Except, this time, Disney wasn't counting on a mass exodus of
subscribers and Jimmy Kimmel has 3 more years on his contract. Rumor
has it he's already talking to attorneys.

Guessing: since Kimmel broke FCC rules, Disney probably has some good legal ground break the contract.

"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."

Which was proven false long before his show aired. Of course, for mindless bots programmed by your TV, like you, you'd never know this.

He pushed propaganda and blatently lied, breaking FCC rules.


... It is always darkest just before you turn on the lights.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ ** The Gate BBS - Shelby, NC - thegateb.synchro.net **

poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

Dumas Walker wrote to MATTHEW MUNSON <=-

This what Kimmel said. Few people appear to have actually heard what he said, but who cares about accuracy any more?

As I just typed in a previous post (won't quote it here), I support his
RIGHT to say what he wants. I didn't watch him anyway. :-)



... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Dr. What to poindexter FORTRAN on Wed Sep 24 2025 07:53 am

Wow. The utter cluelessness of that statement is astounding.
Can you even think for yourself, or are you just another bot who

whats IRONIC is he opened up saying we are misinformed when we absolutely
are not. and then he does a whatabout argument about trump.

i don't give a fuck about trump. i do give a fuck about people in the media that are affecting our culture and causing political assassinations and other acts of domestic terrorism. i've had enough of trans liberals killing kids and going on rampages.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

This what Kimmel said. Few people appear to have actually heard what he
said, but who cares about accuracy any more?

Apparently you certainly don't care about accuracy, as you stopped your
quoting right before where he called Trump a d!ck, which was the
potentially offensive bit I called him out for. If I google "Kimmel
dictator dick," the first article that comes up is from the Guardian.

Their quote, unlike yours, includes that part.

He also insinuated that the kid might be MAGA -- that MAGA needed to desparately distance themselves from -- which turned out not to be the
case. Claiming that didn't really make sense.

Trump looked like a fool, Kimmel called it out, and his administration
is continuing to push a dangerous narrative that "liberal violence and
hate" is the enemy.

All violence and hate is an enemy. I have no issues with someone pointing
out that this includes leftist violence as, guess what, that exists but a
lot of people like to ignore it. In this particular case, a kid hated Kirk because of his right-wing views and acted on it. In this case, and a few
other recent ones, leftist violence and hate had everything to do with it.

We *do* need to get away from the necessity to label stuff "right" or
"left" as a lot of what is developing defies political definition. IMHO, it would be better defined as apolitical -- and sociopathic.

Trump ordered the FCC to intimidate ABC, ABC
probably wanted to get rid of their late night show anyways, and saw a
patsy.

I agree they are probably looking to get rid of their late night show. Now they still have their patsy when the time comes.


* SLMR 2.1a * He's not dead,he's electroencephalographically challenged
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

the more radical news they report, the more money comes in.
i hate to say this but i think our media should be regulated.

I would like to see them go back to the Fairness Doctrine. IMHO, that was regulation enough.


* SLMR 2.1a * I before E except after C, huh? Weird.....
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Hello Dr. What!

** On Wednesday 24.09.25 - 07:53, Dr. What wrote to poindexter FORTRAN:

The facts are:
1. Kimmel broke FCC rules.

False. The FCC does not regulate content. Kimmel only
expressed an opinion.

2. The ratings for Kimmel's show is tanking and has been
for some time now.

So what? Even if it were true, it's not FCC's mandate to
monitor ratings.

3. The LOCAL AFFILIATES dropped Kimmel's show because of
what he said.

They might rethink that when they cool off.

Disney, who's finances are hurting because of THEIR
Wokeness, probably wanted to difuse this mess as quickly
as possible.

I doubt that Disney is hurting financially. It's their
business, not yours.

Guessing: since Kimmel broke FCC rules, Disney probably
has some good legal ground break the contract.

Kimmel is not answerable to the FCC.


--

--- OpenXP 5.0.64
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
* Synchronet * CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Dumas Walker to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Wed Sep 24 2025 10:06 am

Trump ordered the FCC to intimidate ABC, ABC probably wanted to get
rid of their late night show anyways, and saw a patsy.

I agree they are probably looking to get rid of their late night
show. Now they still have their patsy when the time comes.

broadcasters nexstar and sinclair say they are pulling the show from their affiliate stations. they own 70/250 abc stations

i heard the kimmel show being referred as a donation to the left movement and i think that's a good description. it's not a money maker.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Dumas Walker to MRO on Wed Sep 24 2025 10:06 am

the more radical news they report, the more money comes
in. i hate to say this but i think our media should be regulated.

I would like to see them go back to the Fairness Doctrine. IMHO,
that was regulation enough.

yeah that sounds decent. it sounds 'fair'. too bad we don't live in a fair world. it would be great to have a totally unbiased 'news' source, too.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: liberals being cancel
By: Ogg to Dr. What on Wed Sep 24 2025 09:15 pm

Hello Dr. What!

** On Wednesday 24.09.25 - 07:53, Dr. What wrote to poindexter
FORTRAN:

The facts are: 1. Kimmel broke FCC rules.

False. The FCC does not regulate content. Kimmel only expressed

i don't know where you get your information, but the fcc DOES regulate
content on various aspects of programming. it's a very complicated agency. they dont make laws, but their regulations and rules make it seem like they are.

2. The ratings for Kimmel's show is tanking and has been for some
time now.

So what? Even if it were true, it's not FCC's mandate to monitor
ratings.

what kimmel was doing is essentially inciting misinformation about an assassination that was politically motivated. in today's age, that means more violence.

3. The LOCAL AFFILIATES dropped Kimmel's show because of what he
said.

They might rethink that when they cool off.

why would they? they are in it for the money and the kimmel show doesnt make money. it's a shill for the left.

Guessing: since Kimmel broke FCC rules, Disney probably has some good legal ground break the contract.

Kimmel is not answerable to the FCC.

again, you are wrong.

in the end the dumpster fire that is the kimmel show will go out with a whimper. i dont give a shit but i do like that smirking sexist piece of shit get whats coming to him at the same time.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

DUMAS WALKER wrote to <=-

the more radical news they report, the more money comes in.
i hate to say this but i think our media should be regulated.

I would like to see them go back to the Fairness Doctrine. IMHO, that
was regulation enough.

Network television should require shows to have a variety of guests. Even
if Jimmy Kimmel has to invite Thomas Massie or Rand Paul once a month to chat.


... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ wcQWK 8.0 ÷ Inland Utopia * iutopia.duckdns.org:2323

MRO wrote to Dr. What <=-

whats IRONIC is he opened up saying we are misinformed when we
absolutely are not. and then he does a whatabout argument about trump.

Ya, but that's standard TDS. I think the gov't is still offering free treatment for that. Maybe he'll take advantage of that. But probably not.

i don't give a fuck about trump. i do give a fuck about people in the media that are affecting our culture and causing political
assassinations and other acts of domestic terrorism. i've had enough
of trans liberals killing kids and going on rampages.

And I think that echos many people today. They may or may not like Trump. But they are starting to hate the Left.


... Jesus saves....Passes to Moses....He shoots! HE SCORES!
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ ** The Gate BBS - Shelby, NC - thegateb.synchro.net **

Ogg wrote to Dr. What <=-

The facts are:
1. Kimmel broke FCC rules.

False. The FCC does not regulate content. Kimmel only
expressed an opinion.

You need to get some education. The FCC does, in fact, regulate content and always has.

So what? Even if it were true, it's not FCC's mandate to
monitor ratings.

No, but it is the reason the show got yanked. The local affiliates can't get anyone to advertise in that slot because of the low ratings.

But you are showing your programming by thinking that the FCC yanked Kimmel's show.

3. The LOCAL AFFILIATES dropped Kimmel's show because of
what he said.

They might rethink that when they cool off.

That doesn't look like that's happening. His low ratings got even lower. They can run a bad 1950's movie in that slot and get better ratings now.

I doubt that Disney is hurting financially. It's their
business, not yours.

And we have another low information poster here.

Kimmel is not answerable to the FCC.

And your programming is showing yet again.

Perhaps you can go back to a good school and be taught how to think for yourself.


... Excuse me if I sound bitter....I taste that way too
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ ** The Gate BBS - Shelby, NC - thegateb.synchro.net **

MRO wrote to DaiTengu <=-

to me it looks like kimmel is a loss, so i'm not sure why they let him continue on. i dont care though. i was a kimmel viewer since day one
but i had to stop watching that show when it became a one man 'the
view'.

he's dishing out stuff that most people want so i'm not sure how he can continue on making shows.

It could be because someone ran the numbers and looked at the contract and decided that it would be cheaper to have him continue, but have very few local affiliates to broadcast the show.

But this is also Woke Disney and the Woke will never accept their failures and always double down on them.


... When all is said and done, more is said then done.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ ** The Gate BBS - Shelby, NC - thegateb.synchro.net **

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

This what Kimmel said. Few people appear to have actually heard what he said, but who cares about accuracy any more?

Apparently you certainly don't care about accuracy, as you stopped your quoting right before where he called Trump a d!ck, which was the potentially offensive bit I called him out for. If I google "Kimmel dictator dick," the first article that comes up is from the Guardian.

Which has nothing to do with Charlie Kirk.

Their quote, unlike yours, includes that part.

I looked up that Guardian quote you mention. You might have missed that
Kimmel referred to Trump as a dick happened on a different show, during
Trump's England visit, not the show where he made fun of Trump's
response to Kirk's killing.

If you're offended by Kimmel, you get to be. You can choose not to
watch him. The problem is when people get offended and choose to use
the government to silence them.

I suppose the republicans are woke and supporting cancel culture now
that it fits their goals.

He also insinuated that the kid might be MAGA -- that MAGA needed to desparately distance themselves from -- which turned out not to be the case. Claiming that didn't really make sense.

Trump looked like a fool, Kimmel called it out, and his administration
is continuing to push a dangerous narrative that "liberal violence and
hate" is the enemy.

All violence and hate is an enemy. I have no issues with someone
pointing out that this includes leftist violence as, guess what, that exists but a lot of people like to ignore it. In this particular case,
a kid hated Kirk because of his right-wing views and acted on it. In
this case, and a few other recent ones, leftist violence and hate had everything to do with it.

We *do* need to get away from the necessity to label stuff "right" or "left" as a lot of what is developing defies political definition.
IMHO, it would be better defined as apolitical -- and sociopathic.

Trump ordered the FCC to intimidate ABC, ABC
probably wanted to get rid of their late night show anyways, and saw a patsy.

I agree they are probably looking to get rid of their late night show.
Now they still have their patsy when the time comes.

* SLMR 2.1a * He's not dead,he's electroencephalographically
challenged ---
Synchronet CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Matthew Munson wrote to DUMAS WALKER <=-

Network television should require shows to have a variety of guests.
Even if Jimmy Kimmel has to invite Thomas Massie or Rand Paul once a
month to chat.

Um, no.

Let the market determine who gets on. If people want to see Rand Paul,
they'll watch the show. If they don't want to watch, they won't and the
network will lose advertising revenue.




--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

the more radical news they report, the more money comes
in. i hate to say this but i think our media should be regulated.

I would like to see them go back to the Fairness Doctrine. IMHO,
that was regulation enough.

yeah that sounds decent. it sounds 'fair'. too bad we don't live in a fair world. it would be great to have a totally unbiased 'news' source, too.

That is that the doctrine was supposed to do... force the news sources to accurately represent both sides of a matter. It was repealed/removed and
we are now living in the results.


* SLMR 2.1a * Tyrants like an unarmed populous.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

I would like to see them go back to the Fairness Doctrine. IMHO, that was regulation enough.

Network television should require shows to have a variety of guests. Even
if Jimmy Kimmel has to invite Thomas Massie or Rand Paul once a month to chat.

With Massie in particular, they might find some common ground re: the
Epstein list.


* SLMR 2.1a * A reasonable man accomplishes nothing.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Guessing: since Kimmel broke FCC rules, Disney probably
has some good legal ground break the contract.

Kimmel is not answerable to the FCC.

Kimmel is not directly answerable, but the network and the affiliates that carry the content are.

From the FCC website:

"The FCC does impose certain restraints and obligations on broadcasters. Speech regulations are confined to specific topics, which usually have been identified by Congress through legislation or adopted by the FCC through full notice-and-comment rulemaking or adjudicatory proceedings. These topics include: indecency, obscenity, sponsorship identification, conduct of on-air contests, hoaxes, commercial content in children's TV programming, broadcast news distortion, accessibility to emergency information on television, and inappropriate use of Emergency Alert System warning tones for entertainment or other non-emergency purposes."

From past news stories, I do know that the FCC does levy fines against broadcasters for at least the first two topics listed.


* SLMR 2.1a * I was a tall person before I used PKZIP...!
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Hello Dr. What!

You need to get some education. The FCC does, in fact, regulate content and always has.

Not according to another chairman who works at the FCC. They
just issue licenses.

--- OpenXP 5.0.64
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
* Synchronet * CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Matthew Munson to DUMAS WALKER on Wed Sep 24 2025 09:33 pm

I would like to see them go back to the Fairness Doctrine. IMHO,
that was regulation enough.

Network television should require shows to have a variety of guests.
Even if Jimmy Kimmel has to invite Thomas Massie or Rand Paul once
a month to chat.

well i think that would be going too far.
and also i heard that liberals wont go on conservative shows, podcasts,etc. furthermore these are paid guests.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Dumas Walker to MATTHEW MUNSON on Thu Sep 25 2025 09:40 am

I would like to see them go back to the Fairness
Doctrine. IMHO, that was regulation enough.

Network television should require shows to have a variety of guests.
Even if Jimmy Kimmel has to invite Thomas Massie or Rand Paul once
a month to chat.

With Massie in particular, they might find some common ground re: the Epstein list.

if you want to know who is on the epstein list just make your own list of the world's most powerful people and you will probably be 95% accurate.

releasing the names wont really accomplish much. all the news sources would let it blow over.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: liberals being cancel
By: Ogg to Dr. What on Thu Sep 25 2025 11:04 am

Hello Dr. What!

You need to get some education. The FCC does, in fact, regulate content and always has.

Not according to another chairman who works at the FCC. They just
issue licenses.

okay, well he's wrong.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Ogg wrote to Dr. What <=-

You need to get some education. The FCC does, in fact, regulate content and always has.

Not according to another chairman who works at the FCC. They
just issue licenses.

Another DEI hire that needs to be removed at the FCC.


... 20 Dumb Blonds in freezer: Frosted flakes.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ ** The Gate BBS - Shelby, NC - thegateb.synchro.net **

On 24 Sep 2025, MRO said the following...

False. The FCC does not regulate content. Kimmel only expressed

i don't know where you get your information, but the fcc DOES regulate content on various aspects of programming. it's a very complicated agency. they dont make laws, but their regulations and rules make it
seem like they are.

I don't often agree with you publicly, but in this case, I will. An example would be how the FCC regultes what can and canot not be said over the air on amateur radio. ie you swear too much, there goes your license. Or at least thats the way i think it used to be.

... A .GIF is worth a thousand .TXT.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Listen To: http://radio.klyntar.net

On 25 Sep 2025, Dr. What said the following...

But this is also Woke Disney and the Woke will never accept their
failures and always double down on them.

For Pete's sake, if you are going to use a word use it correctly!!!!!!!!

... (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)nfluence with large hammer.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Listen To: http://radio.klyntar.net

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Warp 4 to MRO on Fri Sep 26 2025 11:09 am

I don't often agree with you publicly, but in this case, I will.

boy thanks, fuck you too.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Warp 4 to Dr. What on Fri Sep 26 2025 11:11 am

On 25 Sep 2025, Dr. What said the following...

But this is also Woke Disney and the Woke will never accept their failures and always double down on them.

For Pete's sake, if you are going to use a word use it
correctly!!!!!!!!

it is being used correctly, shit dick
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

This what Kimmel said. Few people appear to have actually heard what he said, but who cares about accuracy any more?

Apparently you certainly don't care about accuracy, as you stopped your quoting right before where he called Trump a d!ck, which was the potentially offensive bit I called him out for. If I google "Kimmel dictator dick," the first article that comes up is from the Guardian.

Which has nothing to do with Charlie Kirk.

My whole point was that language is something your station/network can get
in trouble with the FCC for. So you have someone that decided that
bringing up a touchy subject... a death no less... and trying to use it to
get laughs (or whatever Kimmel thought it would do) which generates a bunch
of phone calls and negative press.

He also worked in... same show, different recent show, doesn't matter... what many would consider an obscenity, which could be an FCC liability and, since his ratings are not good, he has given you your out.

I am not a Kirk fan but I am also not stupid enough to try to work his
recent death into any conversation where I plan to cast said death, or
those who were fans of Kirk, into any negative light unless I was looking
to get fired. What kind of moron does do that?

I don't find Kimmel offensive so much as I find him a crass, stupid person
that apparently some equally crass, stupid people find "clever." I only
know about what he did because there are people here, and on social media,
who keep track of him. The latter group seems made up mostly of people who
who look to him as a "thought leader," which is as ill-advised as looking
to Kirk as one.


* SLMR 2.1a * S & M: You always hurt the one you love.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Dumas Walker to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Fri Sep 26 2025 10:49 am

I don't find Kimmel offensive so much as I find him a crass, stupid
person that apparently some equally crass, stupid people find
"clever." I only know about what he did because there are people
here, and on social media, who keep track of him. The latter group
seems made up mostly of people who who look to him as a "thought

As joe rogan said, kimmel has a 'go fuck yourself' style.

is he really telling jokes or just manipulating people?
I'd like to know what trump really did to kimmel. they must have met in person and trump must have got his goat and kimmel has been working so hard all these years to get his confidence or sense of face back.

If people think kimmel is funny or entertaining i think the only reasoning is they just want to hear bad things about trump all the time.

personally i dont want to hear about trump all the time. i had a liberal gf with severe tds and she would just talk randomly in the car about how he was
a rapist, etc etc. trump was in her brain all the time. i dont like to have shit running around unresolved in my head and i don't know how people can
live that way. yet, there are many many people who do live that way.

There's seriously some type of new mental illness where it's political
belief derangement. Furthermore most of these people do not understand how politics work or how the different branches of our govt operate.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

is he really telling jokes or just manipulating people?

Well, I don't often find him funny any more, so...

Honestly, I am not sure I ever found him by himself funny, although some of
his interactions with guests are. I find Fallon to be funnier, but don't intentionally watch either of them.

I'd like to know what trump really did to kimmel. they must have met in person and trump must have got his goat and kimmel has been working so hard all these years to get his confidence or sense of face back.

I think it is more simple than that. Kimmel said some things Trump did not like and then Trump started talking about him all the time, so Kimmel knows
he has Trump's attention. I also suspect that Kimmel does a lot of it in
hopes of drawing more (left) eyes to his show... he could use the ratings boost.

If people think kimmel is funny or entertaining i think the only reasoning is they just want to hear bad things about trump all the time.

Based on social media commentary/posts, I would have to agree that many
sure do.

There's seriously some type of new mental illness where it's political
belief derangement. Furthermore most of these people do not understand how politics work or how the different branches of our govt operate.

There seem to be a lot of my more left-leaning friends who can tell me all about what Trump has said or done today than most of the rabid MAGAs I
know. By the same token, the rabid MAGAs kept track of Biden's doings a
lot more than any one else did, and I suspect it was the "future MAGAs" who were always telling us what Obama was up to.

It has been going on for a while but continues to get worse.


* SLMR 2.1a * Camel: A quarter horse designed by a committee.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: poindexter FORTRAN to Dumas Walker on Thu Sep 25 2025 09:16 am

I suppose the republicans are woke and supporting cancel culture now
that it fits their goals.

It had to happen.

I mean, at some point you realize all the magazines in the Submission Grinder are going to sabotage your submissions if your persona does not fall within their aproved political model. You are going to realize you cannot take part in online communities because some politicla view you expressed elsewhere does not suit some head honcho within that community.

You are going to realize there is a full blown war going on in the shadows whose objective is to have you isolated and destroyed.

So yeah at some point you are going to fight back because you are going to realize you will be a gonner if you don't show you have teeth.

It sucks, but you invented this shit. Now, own it.


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

---
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Dumas Walker to MRO on Sat Sep 27 2025 09:03 am

I think it is more simple than that. Kimmel said some things Trump
did not like and then Trump started talking about him all the time,
so Kimmel knows he has Trump's attention. I also suspect that Kimmel
does a lot of it in hopes of drawing more (left) eyes to his show...
he could use the ratings boost.

i dont think these people that talk about trump really think. the more you talk about trump, good or bad the better it is for trump. to ignore him
would take away most of his super trump powers. he's like some mystical
deity. the more you talk about him the bigger he gets.

There seem to be a lot of my more left-leaning friends who can tell
me all about what Trump has said or done today than most of the
rabid MAGAs I know. By the same token, the rabid MAGAs kept track
of Biden's doings a lot more than any one else did, and I suspect
it was the "future MAGAs" who were always telling us what Obama
was up to.

It has been going on for a while but continues to get worse.

with biden it was obvious that he was president autopen.
He was a sick old man and he was not fit to be president. Everyone with a brain knows it. i dont think with biden there was the type of derangement that you see with trump.

i always referred to biden's office as an example of elderly abuse. they let him go out there and embarass himself when in the past he was one of the sharpest loose cannons. He brutalized Paul Ryan in a debate before his
health took a downturn.

right now they are claming he's spending hours with a ghost writer writing
his memoirs.

"He holes up for hours at a time in Delaware working on his memoir with a new ghostwriter, while undergoing treatment for an aggressive form of prostate cancer. " HE ISN'T. the man is gold and sick. he probably lays in bed all day and night.

it takes years to get to stage 4 prostate cancer scale 9. he was taking bloodtests for years and other tests. what the hell was going on?
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Arelor to poindexter FORTRAN on Sat Sep 27 2025 01:50 pm

I suppose the republicans are woke and supporting cancel culture
now that it fits their goals.

It had to happen.

I mean, at some point you realize all the magazines in the
Submission Grinder are going to sabotage your submissions if your
persona does not fall within their aproved political model. You are
going to realize you cannot take part in online communities
because some politicla view you expressed elsewhere does not suit
some head honcho within that community.

liberals in the usa are largely morons. even the smart ones don't want to think. they dont realize that since trump lost that dude was on the road campaigning and making sure his enemies were not getting voted in.

the funny thing is they cancled him on social media and everything so not
only were the news stations not making money by reporting on everything about trump, they couldnt actively track what he was doing so easily.

Trump has a long cancel list, a lot of them republicans who he dealt with. liz cheney was on the top of the list. also several of them retired under pressure. that's his own party.

So yeah at some point you are going to fight back because you are
going to realize you will be a gonner if you don't show you have
teeth.

It sucks, but you invented this shit. Now, own it.

every action has an equal and opposite reaction. cancel culture cuts both ways. yes kimmel is back, his ratings will still suck. it's all a big game at this point.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

MRO wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

i dont think these people that talk about trump really think. the more you talk about trump, good or bad the better it is for trump. to
ignore him would take away most of his super trump powers. he's like
some mystical deity. the more you talk about him the bigger he gets.

The reason for that is the more the Left talks, the most their hypocricy and anti-American views come out.

There's a meme called "Operation: Let Them Speak" which is just getting the Left to publically admit, on video, what they stand for - which is everything unamerican.

Come 2026, anyone running against a Democrat need only show the video of said Democrat speaking as his campaign commercial.

with biden it was obvious that he was president autopen.
He was a sick old man and he was not fit to be president.

I think that there's a good case for NO Democrat to be President today.
They don't have to be old and feeble-minded to be unfit to be President.

Everyone
with a brain knows it. i dont think with biden there was the type of derangement that you see with trump.

There was the opposite with Biden. "Biden Organization Syndrome"

i always referred to biden's office as an example of elderly abuse.

It certainly was sad to see that. No snarky comment here. Elder abuse is bad no matter who it's being done to.

they let him go out there and embarass himself when in the past he was
one of the sharpest loose cannons.

The only difference is that back then, Biden **knew** he was lying.


... You're only young once. You're immature forever.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ ** The Gate BBS - Shelby, NC - thegateb.synchro.net **

I think it is more simple than that. Kimmel said some things Trump
did not like and then Trump started talking about him all the time,
so Kimmel knows he has Trump's attention. I also suspect that Kimmel
does a lot of it in hopes of drawing more (left) eyes to his show...
he could use the ratings boost.

i dont think these people that talk about trump really think. the more you talk about trump, good or bad the better it is for trump. to ignore him would take away most of his super trump powers. he's like some mystical deity. the more you talk about him the bigger he gets.

That is true but, if posts on social media can be trusted, there are a lot
of never-Trump folks out there who will get upset if their talking heads
don't tell them something bad about Trump every day.

it takes years to get to stage 4 prostate cancer scale 9. he was taking bloodtests for years and other tests. what the hell was going on?

Considering that he was President for 4 years, you would think someone
would have been checking his PSA levels at least.


* SLMR 2.1a * Look maw, kitty goes POP when ya plug er in da waal.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

My whole point was that language is something your station/network can
get in trouble with the FCC for. So you have someone that decided that bringing up a touchy subject... a death no less... and trying to use it
to get laughs (or whatever Kimmel thought it would do) which generates
a bunch of phone calls and negative press.

Late night has different guidelines and rules. I saw it differently, he
wasn't using Charlie Kirk's death to get laughs, he was pointing out
Trump's hypocrisy, calling Kirk a good friend one minute and responding
to a question about how he's dealing with his death to redirect to the
construction of his ballroom.

He also worked in... same show, different recent show, doesn't
matter... what many would consider an obscenity, which could be an FCC liability and, since his ratings are not good, he has given you your
out.

What obscene word did Kimmel use in the monologue in question?

As it turns out, the FCC, Disney and Sinclair all lost this round.
Kimmel's ratings are up, he's back on the air, Disney is now
offering huge discounts to try and get customers back after they
cancelled their subscriptions, and the conservative media conglomerate
who wanted to obey-in-advance of a merger they wanted approved has put
him back on as well.

I am not a Kirk fan but I am also not stupid enough to try to work his recent death into any conversation where I plan to cast said death, or those who were fans of Kirk, into any negative light unless I was
looking to get fired. What kind of moron does do that?

I don't find Kimmel offensive so much as I find him a crass, stupid
person that apparently some equally crass, stupid people find "clever."
I only know about what he did because there are people here, and on social media, who keep track of him. The latter group seems made up mostly of people who who look to him as a "thought leader," which is as ill-advised as looking to Kirk as one.

* SLMR 2.1a * S & M: You always hurt the one you love.
---
Synchronet CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Arelor wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-

So yeah at some point you are going to fight back because you are going
to realize you will be a gonner if you don't show you have teeth.

It sucks, but you invented this shit. Now, own it.

I don't know who you're talking to, but I ain't him, pal.



--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: poindexter FORTRAN to Dumas Walker on Sun Sep 28 2025 06:46 pm

Late night has different guidelines and rules. I saw it differently,
he wasn't using Charlie Kirk's death to get laughs, he was pointing

he was literally lying and saying the killer was 'maga'
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

As it turns out, the FCC, Disney and Sinclair all lost this round.
Kimmel's ratings are up, he's back on the air, Disney is now
offering huge discounts to try and get customers back after they
cancelled their subscriptions, and the conservative media conglomerate
who wanted to obey-in-advance of a merger they wanted approved has put
him back on as well.

That is a good thing for you. I would hate for you to miss a chance to
learn what your opinion is supposed to be.


* SLMR 2.1a * "The goal of socialism is communism." - V. Lenin
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Late night has different guidelines and rules. I saw it differently,
he wasn't using Charlie Kirk's death to get laughs, he was pointing

he was literally lying and saying the killer was 'maga'

He was implying it.

From what I read on the FCC site, and posted here, it could be an issue if
he were considered a newscaster. Since he is an entertainer, that
monologue probably didn't violate any "no misleading news" clause.

OTOH, so many idiots look to entertainers for their daily news it blurs the lines quite a bit.


* SLMR 2.1a * A man without a gun will soon not be free.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: Dumas Walker to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Mon Sep 29 2025 08:46 am

this round. Kimmel's ratings are up, he's back on the air, Disney
is now offering huge discounts to try and get customers back after

poindexter, this is funny. disney is raising their rates oct 1st.
there's no huge discounts.

they cancelled their subscriptions, and the conservative
media conglomerate who wanted to obey-in-advance of a merger they
wanted approved has put him back on as well.

That is a good thing for you. I would hate for you to miss a chance
to learn what your opinion is supposed to be.

yeah sadly he just goes with what he's told to believe.
makes it easy.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

That is a good thing for you. I would hate for you to miss a chance to learn what your opinion is supposed to be.

When you resort to personal attacks instead of defending your position,
you've already lost.



--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Re: Re: liberals being cancel
By: poindexter FORTRAN to Dumas Walker on Tue Sep 30 2025 06:53 am

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

That is a good thing for you. I would hate for you to miss a chance
to learn what your opinion is supposed to be.

When you resort to personal attacks instead of defending your
position, you've already lost.

another old saying: the truth hurts.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

That is a good thing for you. I would hate for you to miss a chance to learn what your opinion is supposed to be.

When you resort to personal attacks instead of defending your
position, you've already lost.

Yet another classic regurgitated Libtard talking point!

This one has been well indoctrinated.



... Your proctologist called - he found your head.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL